Comments on: ConVars (cvars) in SourceMod http://www.sourcemod.net/devlog/?p=131 SourceMod Development - Or Something Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:45:55 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Zenith http://www.sourcemod.net/devlog/?p=131&cpage=1#comment-9875 Zenith Thu, 03 May 2007 19:19:26 +0000 http://www.sourcemod.net/devlog/?p=131#comment-9875 Figured that. Thanks for your answer. Figured that. Thanks for your answer.

]]> By: BAILOPAN http://www.sourcemod.net/devlog/?p=131&cpage=1#comment-9874 BAILOPAN Thu, 03 May 2007 15:51:29 +0000 http://www.sourcemod.net/devlog/?p=131#comment-9874 It'd be a huge amount of work since the API is very, very different (C procedural versus C++ objects). Even if we made wrappers from the old API to the new, it'd be a large undertaking, and we'd have to completely strip out 64bit support. Without wrappers, old code simply wouldn't compile, much less be backwards compatible. We thought about it for about half a second and then realized it wasn't worth it. It’d be a huge amount of work since the API is very, very different (C procedural versus C++ objects). Even if we made wrappers from the old API to the new, it’d be a large undertaking, and we’d have to completely strip out 64bit support. Without wrappers, old code simply wouldn’t compile, much less be backwards compatible.

We thought about it for about half a second and then realized it wasn’t worth it.

]]> By: Zenith http://www.sourcemod.net/devlog/?p=131&cpage=1#comment-9873 Zenith Wed, 02 May 2007 19:15:31 +0000 http://www.sourcemod.net/devlog/?p=131#comment-9873 Wow wish AMXX had handles. I know this may seem like a stupid question, and I pretty much already know the answer to it: How hard would it be to port SourceMod's scripting system (SourcePawn) into AMXX (exclude backwards compatibility for a moment, this is just out of curiosity). Wow wish AMXX had handles. I know this may seem like a stupid question, and I pretty much already know the answer to it: How hard would it be to port SourceMod’s scripting system (SourcePawn) into AMXX (exclude backwards compatibility for a moment, this is just out of curiosity).

]]>